|
Home > Mac > Educational > Genius > User reviews
|
|
Genius 1.7.250 user reviews |
|
|
Genius user reviews (7) | Add your review |
| Version: Genius 1.6 | Reviewer: DetlevSchm
Read all my reviews
Date: 25 Nov 2006, 15:09 UTC Overall rating:      | GUI:     Features:     Ease of use:     Value:     

Note:
1.Claims and comments as of 2006-11-25
2.Comments are based on Genius version 1.6
Claim (CL)
Comment (CO)
CL: Genius helps you memorize things.
CO: True.
CL: It organizes your information using the Leitner "learning cardfile" system,
CO: False.
Rule violation: The "scores" obviously represent compartments of the card file, but there are more than Leitner's 5 compartments, meaning that items are unnecessarily repeated. In fact, it seems to run forever, if the user's patience allows for that.
Rule violation: Genius lets you learn items, that you have successfully retrieved most recently (Learn/review slider in the middle). Note: Could not be reproduced at the time of this evaluation.
Rule violation: According to Leitner you retrieve items from one compartment only at a specific learning session, but Genius offers items from all compartments at a specific learning session.
Leitners "Learning Solitaire" for difficult stuff is not implemented.
Leitner does not mention a functionality represented by Genius' Learn/Review slider. This slider leads to rule violations because learning and reviewing is exactly defined.
CL: and it quizzes you using a spaced repetition method.
CO: False.
"Spacing" is done by the user's pace, who can learn all items on a single day, if it is feasible and he chooses so. Leitner says, that items in higher compartments are due to be repeated less freqently, for example after months when in compartment 5. Genius does not ensure this "spaced repetition".
CL: For each quiz, Genius carefully chooses each question
CO: ? How can a computer program be "careful" or careless ?
CL: based on your past performance,
CO: That probably means you are offered less frequently trained items first.
CL: by combining repetition intervals and
CO: As mentioned above, the repetition intervals are not Leitner-conform.
CL: weighted random selection.
CO: False
If the selection were "weighted" then you would not get items from more than one compartment. Compartments represent different accomplishment states.
Leitner explains how items are put in and retrieved from compartments (first in, last out). There is not only no need for a random selection, it would also be counterproductive, because you would be confronted with more recent items first, instead of vice versa.
Even the switching of compartments is defined, no need for randomness here either.
CL: It even performs lexical similarity analysis for fuzzy answer checking.
CO: False.
Genius makes no difference if you slightly misspell a word or enter a totally wrong one. Example: Right answer "Charlie", Genius cannot distinguish between "Charli" and "Otto"
This evaluation does not mean, that Genius cannot help you memorizing (it is just different from the Leitner System), nor that it does not make fun. Also, from all learing software of various platforms I took notice of, Genius has the most appealing user interface, altough the user interface's font is rather small on a modern screen with a large number of pixels per square inch.
Finally, the "developer's homepage" http://web.mac.com/jrc/Genius/ does not mention Leitner at all :-), however, they talk about "careful programs" (same wording as above) :-). |
SHARE YOUR OPINION ABOUT Genius
|
|
|